12-02-2009, 01:42 AM | #31 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 13
|
It's been two more weeks with no answer from lawyers
Quote:
I have three unused monitors attached to my DELL server that is running as a workstation (with RAID 5 and error-correcting ram). Please get your legal department to be reasonable. (I suspect none of us has any interest in your "thin client" product.) |
|
12-10-2009, 02:49 PM | #32 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1
|
How about Windows Home Server at least?
Would it be possible to make the installer permit Windows Home Server - which does have Server 2003 SBS underlying but should be uniquely identifiable.
That seems like it should not run afoul of the thin clients and still fill a huge hole for those of us who want to better manage the headless WHS boxes out there. Thanks in advance, Richard |
12-28-2009, 02:14 PM | #33 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1
|
Quote:
|
|
01-05-2010, 06:24 AM | #34 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 13
|
Another month has gone by without any response from the legal people.
When are your legal people going to treat us fairly? It's been a half a year!
|
04-21-2010, 03:24 AM | #35 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 13
|
Windows Server 2008 still rejected
It's been another half year with no progress.
Recall that I started last June with an ASUS VW223B, downloaded the DisplayLink software for a 64 bit VISTA machine and found that it worked fine with one added monitor on my DELL PowerEdge T605 with Windows Server 2008. I then added two more monitors through Diamond BVU160 adapters only to find that adding more monitors caused DisplayLink to bomb, requiring uninstallation followed by re-installation. I tried this on my laptop running Windows 7, and it also bombed with more than one added monitor. However, downloading a more recent version allowed Windows 7 to more or less run with multiple added monitors. But I have been denied the use of newer corrected versions of DisplayLink on my DELL machine (which I use purely as a workstation). I have written here, I have sent letters to DisplayLink personnel, including the legal department, but there have been no responses in over a half a year. I am really irritated at being denied the use of equipment for which I paid a fair amount of money. Please remove your nasty requirement that denies me the use of your recent corrections, such as version 5.3 Philip F. Meads, Jr., Ph.D. retired accelerator physicist |
04-22-2010, 07:57 PM | #36 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 13
|
Is anyone at DisplayLink paying any attention to these posts????? |
|
|