|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
01-17-2014, 11:28 PM | #111 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1
|
Loose the narrow view display link... what about the ~2 million RaspberryPi boards in circulation? digital signage? - yes you are foolish at best.
Quote:
https://www.change.org/petitions/dis...0-series-chips |
|
02-17-2014, 07:46 PM | #112 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1
|
Another subscriber just to express my disappointment in DisplayLink and the immense power of the content industry.
|
02-28-2014, 04:07 PM | #113 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7
|
The petition passed 250 signatures. That's 250 customers who were affected, found the petition and took the time to sign it in ~2 months.
|
03-01-2014, 11:43 PM | #114 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3
|
|
03-21-2014, 12:39 PM | #115 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1
|
Any news on this? I just got a device and just took for granted that it would work but apparently not
|
03-23-2014, 01:28 PM | #116 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1
|
Just created an account to express my frustration and disappointment for having bought the Lenovo USB 3.0 dock and finding out that there was no linux support for it.
I really hope that the DisplayLink people will change their mind... |
04-01-2014, 07:24 PM | #117 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1
|
This is not only blocking me from buying docking stations for my team, but also it is changing my laptop purchasing. It's really a shame for the leading-edge laptops that have moved to USB3 port replication models.
|
04-02-2014, 11:46 PM | #118 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 8
|
checking back after months, sad to see this is still not fixed
shame on you DisplayLink |
04-05-2014, 11:52 AM | #119 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 4
|
I checked back again to see if there's been any progress, and of course not.
Really, you need to get over the whole content protection racket - it was defeated before it started. Do the world a favor and tell the media cartels that it's not worth the effort on your behalf, and display the damn video anyway. The only thing you are hurting is your sales, as I have already refused solutions in a company because the useless usb3.0 docks weren't supported for me (a full-time linux desktop user). We now consider linux a viable, in-use desktop in our corporation (of ~3500 people), and were considering support aspects of usb3 docks (with this forsaken chipset), which sadly rules out many vendor solutions like Lenovo that push them as a "solution". Your customers need made aware of a distinct lack of support on your part for essentially all future chipsets under linux until you move beyond this ridiculous stigma of content protection being something useful to you and/or the end users. Check usenet or pirate bay, you're really not stopping anything, you're just obviating your platform, and consequently hurting your upstream customers from consideration for purchase and adoption. |
04-07-2014, 01:15 PM | #120 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1
|
Stinks like "yet another marriage with Bingosoft (read Microsoft)". I was always interested how the European Commission can be involved in something like that. This time have a clear reason/case so will ask friends around how to file some anti-competition case.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|